An HR manager texted me at 9:47 PM last Tuesday: "Is there a tool that automatically sends rejection emails? I've been trying to figure out my ATS for 6 months. About to give up."
She's been in HR for 8 years. Has a budget. Uses a AED 45,000/year "top-rated" ATS.
Still ghosts candidates. This isn't just her problem. It's everyone's problem.
Your AED XX,XXX ATS Annual Plan Is Actually Costing You More
Here's what I heard from 15 recruiters last month: "What percentage of candidates fall through the cracks?"
Answers ranged from 15% to 40%. One person said: "Honestly? Probably half. I hate it, but I don't know how to fix it."
These are people using Greenhouse, Lever, Workday the expensive ones that should solve this exact problem. Meanwhile, candidates are posting: "Applied to 47 jobs this month. Heard back from 3. Is this normal?" Yes. It's normal. But it shouldn't be
The Real Cost of Ghosting
Glassdoor Tax: One bad review drops your rating. Lower rating = fewer quality applicants = 2-3x higher recruitment ad spend.
Time Vampire: Let's calculate your actual cost:
15 min/day on "Where's my application?" emails = 65 hours/year
30 min/day manually sending updates = 130 hours/year
45 min/day on email tennis for scheduling = 195 hours/year
Total: 390 hours = money wasted in labor (at AED XXX,XXX annual salary)
That's just ONE recruiter salary.
Reputation Death Spiral: Every ghosted candidate tells their network. They post on LinkedIn. They remember your company forever. Two years later when you have the perfect role? They won't even bother.
Why Your ATS Fails at Hiring
Your ATS was built to track applications. Not treat humans like humans.
It doesn't:
Automatically confirm applications
Keep candidates warm during long hiring processes
Send rejection emails without you manually triggering them
Integrate with your actual communication tools
Save you any real time
It just organizes your chaos slightly better.
The Marketing Approach to Hiring
Here's the shift: What if you recruited like marketers nurture leads?
Marketing teams figured this out years ago you can't just capture a lead and ghost them.
You need to:
Stay in touch consistently
Provide value at every stage
Build relationships before asking for commitment
Automate the boring stuff so humans can focus on humans
That's exactly what HubSpot does. And it turns out recruiting needs the same approach.
What HubSpot Actually Looks Like for Hiring
Sarah switched to HubSpot 6 months ago. Here's her morning now:
8:00 AM - 23 new applications overnight.
8:00:03 AM - All 23 already got this email automatically:
"Thanks for applying! We'll review within 3 days. Either way, you'll hear from us by [auto-date]. Here's what to expect next..."
8:05 AM - She clicks "Phone Screen" for 4 people. They instantly get a calendar link.
8:07 AM - She clicks "Not a Fit" for 8 people. They immediately receive:
"Thanks for your interest. We're moving forward with other candidates, but we were impressed by [specific detail]. Want to join our talent community for future roles?"
Her entire morning workflow: 10 minutes instead of 2 hours.
The 5 Workflows That Change Everything
Set these up once, never think about them again:
Application Confirmation → Instant email with timeline
Phone Screen Scheduler → Auto-sends calendar link
Keep-Warm Sequence → Weekly updates if process drags past 7 days
Interview Follow-Up → Thank you email after every interview
Rejection Email → Instant, kind response when moved to "Not a Fit"
Nobody forgets. Nobody ghosts. It runs 24/7.
When You SHOULD Use HubSpot for Hiring
✅ Startup or scale-up (10-500 employees)
✅ Your Glassdoor reviews are tanking from ghosting
✅ Current ATS costs AED 40,000+ but doesn't feel worth it
✅ You already use HubSpot for marketing/sales
✅ You want to build a talent community, not just fill roles
✅ Your team drowns in manual busywork
The Smart Hybrid Approach
Most companies do this:
| Keep your ATS for: | Use HubSpot for: |
|
|
Connect them with integrations. Best of both worlds.
Here's What Actually Matters
Three months after switching to HubSpot, Sarah told me something that stuck:
"Last week, a candidate we rejected six months ago reached out. She said she appreciated how we treated her during the process kept her informed, sent a thoughtful rejection, invited her to stay connected. She just got promoted at her company and wants to refer three people from her team to us."
That's the ROI nobody puts in a spreadsheet.